Difference between revisions of "ADeV removal of credit history"

From ADempiere
Jump to: navigation, search
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
(ADeV Chair - Metas Worked Only On Own Fork)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*Metas, since taking over the chair of both council and ADempiere e.V, had made zero commits to the core ADempiere source-code, but kept 27 private repositories, by their own admission in the Berlin 2009 meeting.
 
*Metas, since taking over the chair of both council and ADempiere e.V, had made zero commits to the core ADempiere source-code, but kept 27 private repositories, by their own admission in the Berlin 2009 meeting.
 
*Metas [http://www.adempiere.net/web/guest/fundation-contact-data linked] the ADeV council page to this project instead of maintaining the ADempiere project.
 
*Metas [http://www.adempiere.net/web/guest/fundation-contact-data linked] the ADeV council page to this project instead of maintaining the ADempiere project.
*All this point to commercial intent and conduct rather than community as a FOSS project leader.
+
*All this point to commercial intent and conduct rather than community as a FOSS project leader. They clearly abandoned the [http://wiki.adempiere.net/index.php?title=Technical_Team&curid=13114&diff=55109&oldid=52044 Functional] and [http://wiki.adempiere.net/index.php?title=Functional_Team&curid=13115&diff=55108&oldid=54501 Technical] Committees they asked to be elected for. Without working, they kept onto power quietly without announcing all these.

Revision as of 15:55, 21 April 2016

ADeV Chair - Metas Worked Only On Own Fork

  • This fork has clear rebranding as 'Fresh' which inadvertently removes other contributors' credit history.
  • Structure of folders changed making it difficult to merge any improvements back.
  • Metas, since taking over the chair of both council and ADempiere e.V, had made zero commits to the core ADempiere source-code, but kept 27 private repositories, by their own admission in the Berlin 2009 meeting.
  • Metas linked the ADeV council page to this project instead of maintaining the ADempiere project.
  • All this point to commercial intent and conduct rather than community as a FOSS project leader. They clearly abandoned the Functional and Technical Committees they asked to be elected for. Without working, they kept onto power quietly without announcing all these.