Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Permission Rules"

From ADempiere
Jump to: navigation, search
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
m (Interpretation)
(Approved by Citizens?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Approved by Citizens?=
 
=Approved by Citizens?=
 
*I think this page should be linked to the actual citizen vote proposal. That will help me research better. - [[User:Red1|Redhuan D. Oon]] 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 
*I think this page should be linked to the actual citizen vote proposal. That will help me research better. - [[User:Red1|Redhuan D. Oon]] 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[User:Teo sarca|Teo]] 22:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Voting result was:
 +
<pre>
 +
Dear Citizens,
 +
 +
ballots are closed and here are the results to the question
 +
"Do you want the Community Council Team to begin managing permissions according to the concept described here?":
 +
 +
Answer          Votes          %
 +
Yes (a1)                27              75.00%
 +
No (a2)                7              19.44%
 +
abstain (x)    2              5.56%
 +
 +
Consequently CC-Team can start to manage permissions.
 +
 +
Best regards,
 +
Norbert
 +
</pre>
 +
Source: adempiere-citizens@lists.sourceforge.net, 4.10.2010
  
 
=Interpretation=
 
=Interpretation=

Revision as of 15:15, 14 December 2011

Approved by Citizens?

  • I think this page should be linked to the actual citizen vote proposal. That will help me research better. - Redhuan D. Oon 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


Teo 22:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Voting result was:

Dear Citizens,

ballots are closed and here are the results to the question
"Do you want the Community Council Team to begin managing permissions according to the concept described here?":

Answer          Votes           %
Yes (a1)                27              75.00%
No (a2)                 7               19.44%
abstain (x)     2               5.56%

Consequently CC-Team can start to manage permissions.

Best regards,
Norbert

Source: adempiere-citizens@lists.sourceforge.net, 4.10.2010

Interpretation

for voluntary community work, there's a commonly accepted protocol - 
if you taken a post, you 've to show commitment. if you can't, you should vacate it for others that can.
  • Btw the above quoted percept is actually written to me by a famous FOSS creator but declined to take sides, or receive flames.
- Redhuan D. Oon 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)