Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Permission Rules"
From ADempiere
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
m (→Interpretation) |
(→Approved by Citizens?) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Approved by Citizens?= | =Approved by Citizens?= | ||
*I think this page should be linked to the actual citizen vote proposal. That will help me research better. - [[User:Red1|Redhuan D. Oon]] 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | *I think this page should be linked to the actual citizen vote proposal. That will help me research better. - [[User:Red1|Redhuan D. Oon]] 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Teo sarca|Teo]] 22:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Voting result was: | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | Dear Citizens, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ballots are closed and here are the results to the question | ||
+ | "Do you want the Community Council Team to begin managing permissions according to the concept described here?": | ||
+ | |||
+ | Answer Votes % | ||
+ | Yes (a1) 27 75.00% | ||
+ | No (a2) 7 19.44% | ||
+ | abstain (x) 2 5.56% | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consequently CC-Team can start to manage permissions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Best regards, | ||
+ | Norbert | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | Source: adempiere-citizens@lists.sourceforge.net, 4.10.2010 | ||
=Interpretation= | =Interpretation= |
Revision as of 15:15, 14 December 2011
Approved by Citizens?
- I think this page should be linked to the actual citizen vote proposal. That will help me research better. - Redhuan D. Oon 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Teo 22:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Voting result was:
Dear Citizens, ballots are closed and here are the results to the question "Do you want the Community Council Team to begin managing permissions according to the concept described here?": Answer Votes % Yes (a1) 27 75.00% No (a2) 7 19.44% abstain (x) 2 5.56% Consequently CC-Team can start to manage permissions. Best regards, Norbert
Source: adempiere-citizens@lists.sourceforge.net, 4.10.2010
Interpretation
- I have made my POVs in this thread http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/4875394
- I feel that it is a normal and accepted that top contributors be given high merit and respect and be duly consulted when it comes to the administration of a FOSS project and those who happens to play governing roles should understand this percept:
for voluntary community work, there's a commonly accepted protocol - if you taken a post, you 've to show commitment. if you can't, you should vacate it for others that can.
- Btw the above quoted percept is actually written to me by a famous FOSS creator but declined to take sides, or receive flames.
- - Redhuan D. Oon 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)