|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | AN interesting model for virtual ERP consultants. See technofunc.com. They have a central market place, job postings and a way to create virtual teams. A similar model could easily work with ADempiere. [[User:MJMcKay|MJMcKay]] 03:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
| + | Importing file |
| − | | + | |
| − | Here is an example of a potential partnership involving external integration with OS Commerce. [http://www.magneticone.com/PAGE-275-oscommerce-adempiere-erp.html].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Some other project history:
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [[Open Source ERP - Compiere Fork - ADempiere]]
| + | |
| − | * [[NewsArticleHeise.de]]
| + | |
| − | * [[News & Updates]] & [[Current events]] & [[Media Coverage]] & [[Small News]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Adempiere announces ADempiere Business Inc.]] circa 2006. See [https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1615747&forum_id=611167 The relevant SF thread] and [https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1615272&forum_id=610546 ADempiere means Business, another relevant Sourceforge thread]
| + | |
| − | * [[ADempiere gets worldwide professional support]]
| + | |
| − | * [[ADempiere Bazaar- Pioneering the Collaboration Economy]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Full Open Source compliance and Database independence, one step closer with Adempiere first release]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Community]] & [[Citizens]] & [[Committers]] & [[Community Governance]] & [[Community Roles]] & [[Community Permission Rules]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Functional Team]] and [[Technical Team]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Project Management Committee]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Etiquette]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Voting]] & [[How to set up an Election]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Official Contributors rules]]
| + | |
| − | * [[European ADempiere Conference]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[European ADempiere Conference Day1]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[European ADempiere Conference Day2]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[European ADempiere Conference Day3]]
| + | |
| − | * [[2nd European ADempiere Conference Results]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[2nd European ADempiere Conference Day1]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[2nd European ADempiere Conference Day2]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[2nd European ADempiere Conference Day3]]
| + | |
| − | * [[German Community Meeting]]
| + | |
| − | * [[First Brazilian Conference]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Foundation related pages
| + | |
| − | ** [[Foundation Project]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[The ADempiere Foundation]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[Foundation FAQs]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[By Laws]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[How it Works]] - it being the foundation
| + | |
| − | ** [[The ADempiere Foundation Development Program]]
| + | |
| − | ** [[The ADempiere Foundation Sponsorship Program]]
| + | |
| − | {{Note|In the links below, I'm looking for a record of decision. The comment "no conclusion" just means that the thread doesn't contain one.}}
| + | |
| − | ** [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/611167/topic/1702920 Thread:ADempiere Foundation (Proposal), dated 2007-03-28 to 2007-04-02, 6 posts - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | ** [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/1722643 Thread: ADempiere Foundation, proposal for discussion, dated 2007-04-25 to 2007-05-22, 22 (long!) posts - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/611167/topic/1720406 Thread: (New) Thoughts About ADempiere's Role, dated 2007-04-22 to 2007-05-08, 22 (short) posts - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | ** [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/1753314 Thread:ADempiere Foundation, dated 2007-06-09 to 2007-06-11, 6 posts - invites comments.]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/1765180 ADempiere Foundation - Decision Time, dated 2007-06-27 to 2007-06-27, 3 posts - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/3515677 Thread: Foundation Again, dated 2010-01-12 to 2010-05-11, 12 posts - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/611167/topic/3758764 Thread: ADempiere e.V Statement, dated 2010-07-02 to 2010-07-26, 13 posts - invites comments.]
| + | |
| − | *** [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/611167/topic/3784836 Thread: ADempiere e.V. proposal:PMC Concept extension, dated 2010-07-26 to 2010-08-02, 15 posts - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/611167/topic/3801404 Thread: Decentralized Collaborative Model, dated 2010-08-09, 1 post - no conclusion.]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Other relevant pages
| + | |
| − | * [[AdempiereWebsite]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Policy Towards Compiere]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Policy Towards ComPiere's Partners]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Difference With Compiere]]
| + | |
| − | * [[What is ADempiere?]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Our Mission]] - Posterita
| + | |
| − | * [[Our Vision]] - Posterita
| + | |
| − | * [[Social]]
| + | |
| − | * [[The ADempiere World]] and [[The World as seen through ADempiere]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Strategic Plan]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Policy]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Branding Policy]] & [[Brand Usage Rules]] & [[Use of Adempiere name]]
| + | |
| − | * [[The brainstorm files]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Adempiere Structure]]
| + | |
| − | * [[ADempiere Project SWOT Analysis]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Threat of new entrants]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Competition]]
| + | |
| − | * [[ERP Comparison]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Survey: Open Source Enterprise Resource Planning System is a better solution for the Small-Middle Business]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Albert Chen's Life Long Commitment To Compete With SAP]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Bargaining power of customers]]
| + | |
| − | * [[FUD]] and [[Counter FUD]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Why Adempiere]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Why should a company implement Adempiere?]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Technological]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Marketing]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Marketing Materials]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Road Map]]
| + | |
| − | * [[World-wide Directory]]
| + | |
| − | * [[The German ADempiere society]]
| + | |
| − | * [[ADempiere Bazaar- Pioneering the Collaboration Economy]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Ethical behaviour]] - incomplete
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Of interest
| + | |
| − | * [[6 Years On Open Source]]
| + | |
| − | * [[The Red1 Story]] & [[Red1/ADempiereShow]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Training Courses]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Key partner websites - the next layer in the eco-system (not comprehensive, just off the top of my head)
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.globalqss.com Global QSS]
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.idalica.com idalica]
| + | |
| − | *[http://wwww.adaxa.com ADAXA]
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.e-evolution.com e-evolution]
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.metas.de Metas]
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.akunagroup.com Akuna Group]
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.red1.org red1.org]
| + | |
| − | *[http://www.ecosoft.co.th ecosoft]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Case Studies
| + | |
| − | * [[Lori Bonn Designs]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Ecosoft/Bicycle Manufacturer Case Study]] & [[Ecosoft/Customization for Bicycle Manufacturer Case Study]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Partner Experiences]]
| + | |
| − | * [[CivilWorks]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Advertising in the wiki
| + | |
| − | * [[Piero Berritta]] - looks like a user page, but isn't. The most viewed bit of advertising in the wiki - 33rd most popular page with over 32,000 hits. Interesting how he did this.
| + | |
| − | * [[Red1.org]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Metas]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Global Era]]
| + | |
| − | * [[E-Evolution/brochures]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Europe]]
| + | |
| − | * [[ODM]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Posterita Ltd]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Goodwill Consulting]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Gambreng]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Akuna]] & [[Akuna Ltd.]]
| + | |
| − | * [[FransThamura]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Meruvian]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Korranat]]
| + | |
| − | * ... others with less than 500 page views.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [[ADempiere Implementations around the world]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Major Advertised/Branded contributions (This is co-branding which is OK, but it seems to be free, which isn't OK in my opinion. Co-branding should require some sort of financial contribution. Most people contribute freely. To contribute and get brand support should require a financial/royalty deal. ADempiere is promoting specific businesses here which violates some of the discussions above which advocate for the community above business. Note that I'm not privy to all the background here.)
| + | |
| − | : - some good investigative writing going on here? :) .. this paragraph is contentious i mean controversial, but i am not sure if this is the right i mean tight spot to push some light chat on it. Cheers! - [[User:Red1|Redhuan D. Oon]] 00:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | :: Hi Red1. Yes it is controversial, but it is only my opinion. I'm sure there are good reasons why things are the way they. What am I up to? I'm looking for the key bits and insights into the community, how it was created and how it works. Its all part of the story that needs to be told and is the background needed for the marketing plan. Understanding it will help me write the draft - especially the sections that are currently weak. In the end, when you read the marketing plan, it should feel real and authentic to you and all the community members. At that point, a more open discussion would be in order and we can talk about co-branding, advertising, ranking of contributors and other issues that may come up. In the end, I hope to have a plan that everybody agrees with and that a team of us can execute. Note that I haven't had the time to actually read all of these pages yet so some of them may not be relevant. I'm not sure if some of the policies listed were ever ratified. I'll have to ask for your help to figure that out in the next week or so. When I'm done, this page will be deleted. [[User:MJMcKay|MJMcKay]] 03:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC) P.S. Got your book in the mail today!
| + | |
| − | : Thanks for contributing to this discussion Mike, IMO having people/implementors/consulting houses interested in ADempiere and getting their names and number of projects is also contributing to spreading the ADempiere brand all over the world, I imagine most of them are trying to market the ADempiere in the countries they operate. Instead of deleting their presence here it should be promoted. Once they have engaged with the community an upgrade path of presence (based on some sort of financial contribution) should be offered. Just a thought. [[User:Rvergara|Rvergara]] 19:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [[Posterita_Web_POS]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Libero]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Sorceforge customer requests ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Some sample requests received through sourceforge.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610546/topic/4425640 Adempiere Consultant in SoCal area]
| + | |
| − | [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610547/topic/4427289 Adempiere software developer needed]
| + | |
| − | [https://sourceforge.net/projects/adempiere/forums/forum/610548/topic/4427296 Adempiere software programmer needed]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Contributions ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Hi, I translated your site for the Hispanic community [[Marketing_Plan_es]], I suggest you consider these pages functional team [[Functional_Team]] and technical equipment [[Technical_Team]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :: Thanks! I certainly will. [[User:MJMcKay|MJMcKay]] 14:11, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
| + | |
