Difference between revisions of "Talk:Testing Maintenance Management functionality based on Libero Manufacturing"

From ADempiere
Jump to: navigation, search
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=01 June 2009=
 +
Hi Victor,
 +
I have one question to you:
 +
If CAR WORKSHOP EQUIPMENT (big equipment is Asset) and PROFESSIONAL TOOL KIT(maybe Product) are Assets maybe we should add them in Workflow - Tools Tab.
 +
 
=31 May 2009=
 
=31 May 2009=
 
Hi,
 
Hi,

Revision as of 01:00, 1 June 2009

01 June 2009

Hi Victor, I have one question to you: If CAR WORKSHOP EQUIPMENT (big equipment is Asset) and PROFESSIONAL TOOL KIT(maybe Product) are Assets maybe we should add them in Workflow - Tools Tab.

31 May 2009

Hi,

I have full Card of planned maintenance service of cars Mercedes-Benz 220, 210, 211, 203, 202, 140, 168(Russian).

But I created the simple card for this test. I think we should create three BOMs for Preventive Maintenance:

  • Preventive Maintenance 1 - through each 15 000 km
  • Preventive Maintenance 2 - through each 30 000 km
  • Preventive Maintenance 3 - through each 60 000 km

What do you think about it?

- Peter Shepetko 12:26, 31 May 2009 (GMT+2:00)


26 May 2009

Hi Red1,

We will use resource for Maintenance Management :

  1. Material - Material transaction costs (e.g. spare parts).
  2. Labor - Labor resource transaction costs (e.g. mechanic for car).
  3. Equipment - Equipment resource transaction costs (e.g. diagnostics stand).

I think you should use Libero BOM (Multi Level BOM&Formula) if you use Libero MFG. But if you want to create a simple assemblage (e.g. Patio Furniture Set - 1 table, 4 Chairs and 1 Sun Screen) – use standard BOM. Yes, new PP_BOM this as easily as the old BOM.

I think, we should start to test it and add new functionality (e.g. meter readings) and we should check(or create) integration with other modules(e.g. Assets), because about 75 % of functionality (BOM, Forecast, MRP, MPS, CRP and etc.) is in Libero MFG.

What does Victor think about it?

- Peter Shepetko 12:32, 26 May 2009 (GMT+2:00)

24 May 2009: Interested?

  • Hi Victor and Peter. I am also interested in such a system for a prospect and wonder if our ideas are the same:
    • Each maintenance event is a BOM comprising of say:
      • Spare parts
      • Labour charges
    • I intend to use the old simple BOM concept from Compiere.
  • Questions:
    • Can the new PP_BOM do this as easily as the old BOM?
    • What extras can we have in the new system?
  • If it is the same, then we can assist in design, development and testing.
- Red1 18:28, 24 May 2009 (PDT)