Difference between revisions of "Talk:Testing Maintenance Management functionality based on Libero Manufacturing"
From ADempiere
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
(→MM functionality review) |
(→=) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Hi Red1, | Hi Red1, | ||
| − | We will use resource for Maintenance : | + | We will use resource for Maintenance Management : |
# Material - Material transaction costs (e.g. spare parts). | # Material - Material transaction costs (e.g. spare parts). | ||
# Labor - Labor resource transaction costs (e.g. mechanic for car). | # Labor - Labor resource transaction costs (e.g. mechanic for car). | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
: - [[User:pshepetko|Peter Shepetko]] 12:32, 26 May 2009 (GMT+2:00) | : - [[User:pshepetko|Peter Shepetko]] 12:32, 26 May 2009 (GMT+2:00) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=See Also= | =See Also= | ||
[[Testing_Maintenance_Management_functionality_based_on_Libero_Manufacturing|Testing Maintenance Management functionality based on Libero Manufacturing]]. | [[Testing_Maintenance_Management_functionality_based_on_Libero_Manufacturing|Testing Maintenance Management functionality based on Libero Manufacturing]]. | ||
Revision as of 03:43, 26 May 2009
Interested?
- Hi Victor and Peter. I am also interested in such a system for a prospect and wonder if our ideas are the same:
- Each maintenance event is a BOM comprising of say:
- Spare parts
- Labour charges
- I intend to use the old simple BOM concept from Compiere.
- Each maintenance event is a BOM comprising of say:
- Questions:
- Can the new PP_BOM do this as easily as the old BOM?
- What extras can we have in the new system?
- If it is the same, then we can assist in design, development and testing.
- - Red1 18:28, 24 May 2009 (PDT)
===============================================================
Hi Red1,
We will use resource for Maintenance Management :
- Material - Material transaction costs (e.g. spare parts).
- Labor - Labor resource transaction costs (e.g. mechanic for car).
- Equipment - Equipment resource transaction costs (e.g. diagnostics stand).
I think you should use Libero BOM (Multi Level BOM&Formula) if you use Libero MFG. But if you want to create a simple assemblage (e.g. Patio Furniture Set - 1 table, 4 Chairs and 1 Sun Screen) – use standard BOM. Yes, new PP_BOM this as easily as the old BOM.
I think, we should start to test it and add new functionality (e.g. meter readings) and we should check(or create) integration with other modules(e.g. Assets), because about 75 % of functionality (BOM, Forecast, MRP, MPS, CRP and etc.) is in Libero MFG.
What does Victor think about it?
- - Peter Shepetko 12:32, 26 May 2009 (GMT+2:00)
See Also
Testing Maintenance Management functionality based on Libero Manufacturing.
