Difference between revisions of "Talk:Steps To Release"

From ADempiere
Jump to: navigation, search
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
(Database Version)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:Sorry, my mistake. Looks like I have used a wrong Oracle seed. --[[User:Bmovaqar|Bahman]] 22:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:Sorry, my mistake. Looks like I have used a wrong Oracle seed. --[[User:Bmovaqar|Bahman]] 22:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)
 
::Corrected in rev. 2987 --[[User:Bmovaqar|Bahman]] 02:12, 15 July 2007 (EDT)
 
::Corrected in rev. 2987 --[[User:Bmovaqar|Bahman]] 02:12, 15 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
=== SQLJ and views ===
 +
Fixed some issues with SQLJ and views in PostgreSQL dump (rev. 2996). Special thanks go to Hengsin for his valuable help. --[[User:Bmovaqar|Bahman]] 06:10, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Java ==
 +
Fixed a small typo in Adempiere.java ie. DB_VERSION and DATE_VERSION (rev. 2988). Reporting a bit late :-) --[[User:Bmovaqar|Bahman]] 06:14, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Version Scheme ==
 +
I think this have been raise before, do we want to stick to the odd/even version number scheme or it is better to use something like 3.3.0beta1 ? [[User:Hengsin|Hengsin]] 19:53, 17 July 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 16:53, 17 July 2007

Database

Database Version

I noticed that database version in AD_System has the value of 2007-05-01. Am I right? If yes, should we upload a new dump with database version of 2007-07-13? --Bahman 22:32, 14 July 2007 (EDT)

Sorry, my mistake. Looks like I have used a wrong Oracle seed. --Bahman 22:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)
Corrected in rev. 2987 --Bahman 02:12, 15 July 2007 (EDT)

SQLJ and views

Fixed some issues with SQLJ and views in PostgreSQL dump (rev. 2996). Special thanks go to Hengsin for his valuable help. --Bahman 06:10, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

Java

Fixed a small typo in Adempiere.java ie. DB_VERSION and DATE_VERSION (rev. 2988). Reporting a bit late :-) --Bahman 06:14, 16 July 2007 (EDT)

Version Scheme

I think this have been raise before, do we want to stick to the odd/even version number scheme or it is better to use something like 3.3.0beta1 ? Hengsin 19:53, 17 July 2007 (EDT)