Difference between revisions of "Talk:Road Map"

Revision as of 18:02, 14 April 2007

GPL and Apache License compatibility is discussed here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html

There has been doubts about this roadmap been exemplary for ADempere. The latest comment came in thisSF thread by clamerio. Prior to this Colin Rooney and Mike Judd has also raised that the Roadmap has to be reflective of subject matter and features. Ever since there are been attempts to eyeball this. We appreciate anyone to keep on constantly improving on it. Thank you to those who has done the roadmap so far - Red1 01:04, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Red1, I think that defining the roadmap is not a wiki-edit effort. It must be a community effort, some decisions through polls, like clameiro proposed, other decisions based on sponsored work, other decisions based on time-contributions possibilities of developers, others decisions taken by council, etc. It's also very important what we discussed on this CC meeting that I'm bringing here for discussion (CarlosRuiz 12:14, 14 April 2007 (EDT)):

It was agreed that current roadmap is confusing and must be discussed in a later stage with more people from council and community.

• Roadmap must not match with any specific technology or brand or name, only in very special cases
• Roadmap must not have version numbers for things that are not firm yet, probably just some direction for possible future enhancement for those stuff
• Roadmap should convey a clear message to the community - what is committed ( i.e confirm ), what is under investigation ( experiment welcome ) and what is don't know when ( volunteer welcome )

Thanks Carlos Ruiz for anchoring here, where ppl keep refering to when they search for it. - Red1 21:02, 14 April 2007 (EDT)