Difference between revisions of "Talk:People Are Not"
From ADempiere
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
(thank you Paul!) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note: [[User:Phib|Paul]] has greatly contributed to these essays' readibility | Note: [[User:Phib|Paul]] has greatly contributed to these essays' readibility | ||
and still maintain its essense if not further crystalised them. For these i m grateful - [[User:Red1|Red1]] 12:15, 11 January 2007 (EST) | and still maintain its essense if not further crystalised them. For these i m grateful - [[User:Red1|Red1]] 12:15, 11 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | About Is The Resulting Information Free?, I'm agree about the concept of production cost's; however, once produced, some information may be considered special or "private data", like personal data or financial data. From the statistical viewpoint, certain information is highly valuable. From the data mining viewpoint, even the time of a event is valuable information. I hope that this comment will be useful for reinforce the concept that People Are Not. [[User:Fahkami|Fahkami]] 11:01, 22 October 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 22 October 2007
Note: Paul has greatly contributed to these essays' readibility and still maintain its essense if not further crystalised them. For these i m grateful - Red1 12:15, 11 January 2007 (EST)
About Is The Resulting Information Free?, I'm agree about the concept of production cost's; however, once produced, some information may be considered special or "private data", like personal data or financial data. From the statistical viewpoint, certain information is highly valuable. From the data mining viewpoint, even the time of a event is valuable information. I hope that this comment will be useful for reinforce the concept that People Are Not. Fahkami 11:01, 22 October 2007 (EST)
