Difference between revisions of "Talk:POS Systems"
From ADempiere
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
m |
(→Posterita features) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Small correction :-) I didn't put the Lofx codes into SVN, I received by e-mail, tried to make the integration and failed. I also noticed that it can have have some licensing issues, so maybe it's better that author integrate and publish it. / [[User:CarlosRuiz|CarlosRuiz]] 20:11, 22 December 2006 (EST) | ::Small correction :-) I didn't put the Lofx codes into SVN, I received by e-mail, tried to make the integration and failed. I also noticed that it can have have some licensing issues, so maybe it's better that author integrate and publish it. / [[User:CarlosRuiz|CarlosRuiz]] 20:11, 22 December 2006 (EST) | ||
:::So from your quick study of Lofx's codes, how is it better than the present JJ ones? - [[User:Red1|Red1]] | :::So from your quick study of Lofx's codes, how is it better than the present JJ ones? - [[User:Red1|Red1]] | ||
+ | ::::At the same time I was reviewing possible integration with another projects like RedPOS or TinaPOS. I think if a POS is not contributed soon we can look to open a project that way, but maybe this must be a recommendation of this study being made by Alejandro / [[User:CarlosRuiz|CarlosRuiz]] 08:35, 23 December 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | :::::Hengsin is also looking into TinaPos etc, cos his company did a customised solution for a large POS before. He be good addition to team here. [[User:Red1|Red1]] | ||
+ | ::::::I'm looking the [https://sourceforge.net/projects/synpos synPOS] project. They are very young (as us); the project was registered on September 1th. and the status is Alpha still, but they have very interesting features (some of them under development still). [[User:Afalcone|Alejandro]] 15:10, 27 December 2006 (GMT -3:00) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sorry Alejandro. My itchy fingers added to your intro with some lines. Pls remove it if u think i been bad. :) - - [[User:Red1|Red1]] 19:55, 23 December 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Hi Red1. Your comments are always welcomes!! [[User:Afalcone|Alejandro]] 17:10, 26 December 2006 (GMT -3:00) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Posterita features == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hi Alejandro, | ||
+ | |||
+ | I have permitted myself to make some comments on the features list that you provided. I am not sure if I am doing it correctly. Don't hesitate to take them out, if you don't feel these comments should be here. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Hi Fred, | ||
+ | :I think those comments are very useful to users. There they can see the Posterita fulfill a great quantity from them! -- [[User:Afalcone|Alejandro]] 13:59 (+3:00 GMT)February 19, 2007 |
Latest revision as of 09:59, 19 February 2007
I'm writing some considerations about the POS systems. We need enhance the POS functionality and architecture and I want to contribute to it with some expertise I have after have worked +10 years in this type of environment. Of course, all comments are welcome!
- Alejandro 17:05, 22 December 2006 (GMT -3:00)
- Hi, Alejandro,
- This is great, and i notice in the latest Compiere/ADempiere is getting bit better in its POS. Also Carlos has put Lofx codes into SVN/contribution. Maybe u can advice if its useful or substantially good for further works, or shuld we completely redo? - Red1 19:28, 22 December 2006 (EST)
- Small correction :-) I didn't put the Lofx codes into SVN, I received by e-mail, tried to make the integration and failed. I also noticed that it can have have some licensing issues, so maybe it's better that author integrate and publish it. / CarlosRuiz 20:11, 22 December 2006 (EST)
- So from your quick study of Lofx's codes, how is it better than the present JJ ones? - Red1
- At the same time I was reviewing possible integration with another projects like RedPOS or TinaPOS. I think if a POS is not contributed soon we can look to open a project that way, but maybe this must be a recommendation of this study being made by Alejandro / CarlosRuiz 08:35, 23 December 2006 (EST)
- Hengsin is also looking into TinaPos etc, cos his company did a customised solution for a large POS before. He be good addition to team here. Red1
- At the same time I was reviewing possible integration with another projects like RedPOS or TinaPOS. I think if a POS is not contributed soon we can look to open a project that way, but maybe this must be a recommendation of this study being made by Alejandro / CarlosRuiz 08:35, 23 December 2006 (EST)
- So from your quick study of Lofx's codes, how is it better than the present JJ ones? - Red1
- Small correction :-) I didn't put the Lofx codes into SVN, I received by e-mail, tried to make the integration and failed. I also noticed that it can have have some licensing issues, so maybe it's better that author integrate and publish it. / CarlosRuiz 20:11, 22 December 2006 (EST)
Sorry Alejandro. My itchy fingers added to your intro with some lines. Pls remove it if u think i been bad. :) - - Red1 19:55, 23 December 2006 (EST)
- Hi Red1. Your comments are always welcomes!! Alejandro 17:10, 26 December 2006 (GMT -3:00)
Posterita features
Hi Alejandro,
I have permitted myself to make some comments on the features list that you provided. I am not sure if I am doing it correctly. Don't hesitate to take them out, if you don't feel these comments should be here.
- Hi Fred,
- I think those comments are very useful to users. There they can see the Posterita fulfill a great quantity from them! -- Alejandro 13:59 (+3:00 GMT)February 19, 2007