New grouping for products
From ADempiere
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
Contents
- 1 Status
- 2 Contributors
- 3 Overview
- 4 Purpose
- 5 References
- 6 Design Considerations
- 7 Glossary
- 8 Functional Requirements
- 9 Functional team
- 10 Acceptance criteria
- 11 QA and test cases
- 12 Development infrastructure
- 13 Technical Requirements
- 14 Technical team
- 15 Data Requirements
- 16 Non-Functional Requirements
- 17 Open Discussion Items
- 18 Closed Discussion Items
Status
Contributors
Overview
In several implementation, the customer ask for a way to add new classifications, so they need that classification, group 1 and group 2 can be maintained easy , with the current approach the information only can be include as a text but this can cause type mistake and is not friendly for end user.
Purpose
References
Design Considerations
Assumptions
Dependencies
Constraints
Glossary
Functional Requirements
Functional team
- Volunteers for analyzing:
- Mario Calderon 21:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC) - Functional Review
Result of review by Mario Calderon, June 22th, 2013
- General
- Sometimes there is a need of one or few additional product classifications beyond the ADempiere standard (Product Category).
- In these cases, having additional product categories is sensible.
- Implementing this additional information as Attributes can be somehow troublesome (too much work).
- It is good to define product categories in windows, instead of References in Application Dictionary. Users tend to avoid defining data in AD.
- Conclusion: feature that can be useful in some cases.
User roles & profiles
Business process definition
User stories
Functional requirements based on business processes
User Interface Mockups
Acceptance criteria
QA and test cases
Development infrastructure
- The feature was integrated on development main line
- Branch: feature/ADEMPIERE-101-Data-Entity-for-Classification-Group1-Group2
- JIRA-URL: https://adempiere.atlassian.net/browse/ADEMPIERE-101
Technical Requirements
Technical team
- Volunteers for analyzing:
- Result of analysis:
