Difference between revisions of "Bug Triage"
From ADempiere
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
m |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==Volunteering== | ==Volunteering== | ||
| − | [[Triage December 2007]] | + | ===[[Triage December 2007]]=== |
Revision as of 09:28, 8 December 2007
Here we document the meaning of the priority levels assigned to reported bugs.
Contents
Where the bugs are
How to Prioritize
The Project Management Committee has established guidelines for using the priority field in the SF bug tracker. This was discussed in the PMC meeting of 03/06/2007, the notes are here: CC_Meeting_Full_20070306
If you are filling out a report, you can assign priority and group according to the following guidelines:
Priority
- Priority 9 - system stopper - data corruption without workaround
- Priority 7 - security issues
- Priority 5 - not prioritized
- Priority 3 - problems with workarounds - performance problems
- Priority 1 - presentation problems
Group
It's very important also to assign the group for the bug:
- Beta - if you're reporting a bug over a beta functionality
- Core - if you're reporting a bug over a core functionality
- Module specific - if you're reporting affecting just a specific module (not core)
- Report - if you're reporting problems of presentation or reports
Release
From time to time, the bugs will be triaged to re-prioritize them according to these standards.
Priority and group are important, because we will not announce a stable release while there are known priority 9 bugs on core.
